I don’t understand the fascination with rockets when there is antigravity ufo type ships, or arcs, in use that travel at warp speeds. Unless he’s trying to blow the firmament so they can all get out, and others get in? Could be why the rapid unscheduled disassembly occurred.
All posts in the Science category
Scientists Splicing Human Genes into the Food Supply Since 20,000 BC?Published March 5, 2023 by tindertender
Of course they won’t admit it, and they’ve locked away the data in vaults the chattel shall never see.
Some say that during 18,000 BC is when the developed the sow that we eat, by genetically splicing it with humans, and that eating them, is essentially eating self. Canablism. I’ve heard stories of the genetically modifying rice with human dna too. Let me find it.
Its U.S. developers say they could be used to treat children with diarrhoea, a major killer in the Third World.
The rice is a major step in so-called Frankenstein Foods, the first mingling of human-origin genes and those from plants. But the U.S. Department of Agriculture has already signalled it plans to allow commercial cultivation.
The rice’s producers, California-based Ventria Bioscience, have been given preliminary approval to grow it on more than 3,000 acres in Kansas. The company plans to harvest the proteins and use them in drinks, desserts, yoghurts and muesli bars.
The news provoked horror among GM critics and consumer groups on both sides of the Atlantic.
GeneWatch UK, which monitors new GM foods, described it as “very disturbing”. Researcher Becky Price warned: “There are huge, huge health risks and people should rightly be concerned about this.”
Friends of the Earth campaigner Clare Oxborrow said: “Using food crops and fields as glorified drug factories is a very worrying development.
“If these pharmaceutical crops end up on consumers’ plates, the consequences for our health could be devastating.
“The biotech industry has already failed to prevent experimental GM rice contaminating the food chain.
“The Government must urge the U.S. to ban the production of drugs in food crops. It must also introduce tough measures to prevent illegal GM crops contaminating our food and ensure that biotech companies are liable for any damage their products cause.”
In the U.S., the Union of Concerned Scientists, a policy advocacy group, warned: “It is unwise to produce drugs in plants outdoors.
“There would be little control over the doses people might get exposed to, and some might be allergic to the proteins.”
The American Consumers Union and the Washingtonbased Centre for Food Safety also oppose Ventria’s plans.
As well as the contamination fears there are serious ethical concerns about such a fundamental interference with the building blocks of life.
Yet there is no legal means for Britain and Europe to ban such products on ethical grounds.
Imports would have to be accepted once they had gone through a scientific safety assessment.
The development is what may people feared when, ten years ago, food scientists showed what was possible by inserting copies of fish genes from the flounder into tomatoes, to help them withstand frost.
They say they’re using “other animals” but they’re using the human genome. Soul traps?
They’re doing terrible things in Ukraines biolabs. Not only creating weapons of virological assault on life, but most likely contaminating “everything” from food, to medicines.
Estrogen in the Food SupplyPublished March 1, 2023 by tindertender
Estrogen in plastics … have a listen. The food supply is messing humans up fierce!!
This woman is incredibly knowledgeable.
Did you know red clover is plant estrogen?
What the PCR Tests Are Really ForPublished November 26, 2022 by tindertender
The cloning of expressed genes and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), two biotechnological breakthroughs of the 1970s and 1980s, continue to play significant roles in science today. Both technologies give researchers the means to make more DNA, but they do so in different ways. In particular, cloning involves the synthesis of DNA from mRNA using an enzyme called reverse transcriptase. Although this method reverses the flow of genetic information as described by the central dogma, it effectively mimics the process by which RNA viruses “flip” the direction of transcription in their host cells, thereby causing these cells to manufacture viral DNA even though the viruses themselves contain only RNA. In contrast, the polymerase chain reaction does not involve the use of an initial mRNA template to manufacture DNA. Rather, PCR involves the synthesis of multiple copies of specific DNA fragments using an enzyme known as DNA polymerase. This method allows for the creation of literally billions of DNA molecules within a matter of hours, making it much more efficient than the cloning of expressed genes. However, cloning remains the go-to method for researchers when only the mRNA template (and not the DNA template) of a sequence of interest is available.
Read more here:
Some History of the CDC and VaccinesPublished October 20, 2022 by tindertender
Written by @Forrestmaready
For those of you shocked by the CDCs action today re:COVID vaccines on the childhood immunization schedule, you should know that the other shots weren’t necessary either.
Hepatitis B is almost always sexually transmitted.
CDC votes yes anyway. Necessary for infants.
Pertussis (Whooping Cough).
Vaccine doesn’t prevent transmission of disease (proven in actual studies).
CDC votes yes anyway. Necessary for school kids.
Disease is not contagious. Even an actual infection itself doesn’t confer immunity.
CDC votes yes anyway. Necessary for school.
Mortality rates from measles were nearly zero.
Unknown if vaccine prevents transmission.
CDC votes yes anyway. Necessary for school.
Oral vaccine actually a direct source of disease transmission.
CDC votes yes anyway. Necessary for school.
Disease mortality nearly zero before vaccines.
Unknown if vaccine prevents transmission.
CDC votes yes anyway. Necessary for school.
Nearly every single vaccine on the CDC childhood schedule was rubber-stamped in the same way you saw today with the COVID shots.
What you saw in full view today has been going on for decades. The COVID vaccine is no different.
Might want to look into natural immunity.
If you made it this far, this next info might really interest you.
The polio story as you learned it is wrong. It’s one of the most often misunderstood sequence of events in the last two hundred years. I wanted to explain a few things about the disease to help people understand what actually happened.
The first modern account of something resembling polio was in 1789. A physician named Michael Underwood described an illness in children he called “Debility of the Lower Extremities.” He attributed it to teething and foul bowels. https://archive.org/details/b28771254_0001
One of the next mentions was from Louisiana in 1841. A few children came down with paralysis. The supposed cause: teething. Why would teething be associated with paralysis?
Various stories appeared throughout the 1800s of children coming down with paralysis, almost always in their legs. Many people called it “teething paralysis,” but others settled on “infantile paralysis.”
This was a new phenomenon: Doctors had never seen it before and didn’t know why it was happening. Research began to reveal that the cause of paralysis were lesions on the grey part of the spinal cord.
If you developed a lesion on your spinal cord, they called this a “poliomyelitis.” Polio = grey. Myelitis = inflammation of the spinal cord.
A poliomyelitis was a lesion on your spinal cord. You could have more than one of them. But they didn’t know why children had begun developing them, seemingly out of nowhere.
Scientists conducted research on animals by purposefully poisoning them with arsenic, an ingredient of popular medical remedies of the time. The result? Paralysis in their hind legs.
When they did autopsies of the animals, they discovered lesions in their spinal cord. The animals had what they called “poliomyelitis.”
During the 1800s, the most common medical treatments for any sickness contained mercury—in order to clear the bowels. Infants received mercury-containing teething powder.
This wasn’t a fringe treatment, but something as common as Tylenol might be considered today. If the metal arsenic was known to cause poliomyelitis, then perhaps, so could mercury.
Throughout the 1800s, there were a few cases of infantile paralysis that would pop up here and there. Not really any epidemics. In the 1890s, something changed.
A new pesticide was invented in 1892 called lead arsenate near Boston, Mass to combat the spread of a foreign invader—the gypsy moth. It combined lead and arsenic together because it couldn’t be easily washed off.
If you’re interested, I talk about this whole story in my book, “The Moth in the Iron Lung.” You can get it here: https://www.amazon.com/Moth-Iron-Lung-Biography-Polio/dp/1717583679
The pesticide began being sprayed aggressively and within two years, the first real epidemics of poliomyelitis (infantile paralysis) began to appear in the northeastern U.S. Rather than a few children coming down with something, it started getting into the hundreds.
These epidemics affected children more than anyone, but had another strange set of victims: animals. Horses, dogs, chickens, pigs. All dead from poliomyelitis—lesions in their spinal cords that caused paralysis & death. https://archive.org/details/infantileparalys00cave
I say strange because the poliovirus doesn’t affect animals (besides Old World Monkeys). These early outbreaks are referred to as the first polio outbreaks in the U.S., but we know it couldn’t have been due to the poliovirus if animals were being struck.
Another event would confuse scientists of the day—an effect which is the main reason people get the polio story so wrong even today: Koch’s Postulates. https://www.medicinenet.com/kochs_postulates/definition.htm
Koch’s Postulates were some research guidelines that basically stipulated there was a single causative microbe for every disease. It WAS true for all of the other diseases: cholera, typhoid fever, diphtheria.
Over the next few years, scientists discovered that many things could cause a poliomyelitis—it wasn’t just arsenic. There were several other viruses and bacteria that if injected directly into the nervous system could cause lesions that would trigger paralysis.
But the cloud of Koch’s Postulates hung over their research, and many scientists felt that—like all the other diseases—poliomyelitis HAD to be due to ONE thing: a bacteria or a virus. They just had to find it.
You can see the shift in their thinking around this time. They start referring to the disease as a proper noun: Poliomyelitis, rather than using it as a symptom: The patient has a poliomyelitis.
At this time, viruses were still very difficult to work with. They couldn’t see them, only deduce their presence by the symptoms they might cause. In 1908, a virus was found to be able to cause paralysis in monkeys. https://historyofvaccines.org/history/polio/overview
They named it “poliovirus,” because it could cause poliomyelitis in the monkeys. Other viruses and bacteria could cause the same thing: coxsackievirus, echovirus, D68, etc.
With Koch’s Postulates guiding their search, they began to focus on this one virus as THE cause of poliomyelitis, despite knowing there were many other causes. This mistake would create suffering for millions of people over the next few decades.
The question is if viruses and bacteria COULD cause poliomyelitis, why then, and not before? Why did epidemics of polio suddenly appear in the 1900s when they did not exist before?
Some have suggested improvements in sanitation as the cause. They suggest that better sanitation prevented people from picking up the infections as children, when they were protected by their mother’s breastmilk antibodies.
This hypothesis is weak. The disease was called infantile paralysis by many even in the 1940s because it seemed to always strike infants. If better sanitation was the cause, teens or adults should have been the ones with problems.
Also, the early outbreaks were always in rural areas, where there was little change in sanitation practices. Not coincidentally, these rural areas were subjected to heavy pesticide spraying.
The real question is if the spinal cord was well-protected from these paralytic infections, why did it suddenly seem to become vulnerable starting around this time.
I believe ingested pesticides, known to cause cellular membrane dysfunction, created a path directly from the intestines to the bottom of the spinal cord, located directly behind, for the viruses and bacteria to take hold.
This is why multiple viruses (poliovirus, coxsackievirus, echovirus, etc.) all began paralyzing children around this time. It wasn’t a genetic mutation. It wasn’t sanitation improvements. It was a physical alteration of the gut integrity by pesticides.
Modern scientists will say the virus gets in the blood and reaches the spinal cord that way. But why did the infection nearly always affect the bottom of the spinal cord, when the blood supply reaches the entire cord evenly?
This is why I believe infants & children were the worst affected. The bottom of the infant spinal cord (the part that controls the legs) lies directly behind the intestines.
As you grow, the spinal cord does not grow as much as the vertebrae and in adults, the bottom of the spinal cord ends up being much higher in relation to the intestines—well out of reach for most toxic or microbial assaults.
This is why the injected Salk polio vaccine worked so poorly. It created antibodies for only one of many viruses that could paralyze, and it created antibodies in the blood—a useless defense against an intestinal infection.
As lead arsenate fell out of favor because of its toxicity, a new set of synthetic pesticides came into play and made this problem much worse.
After World War 2, DDT began being applied everywhere, sprayed directly onto children’s food, their clothing, their bedding, etc. It made people very sick and the paralysis of poliomyelitis exploded. It was horrible.
By 1952, it was clear many of the insects were becoming DDT-resistant, and its toxicity began to concern people. They began to use safer pesticides and, with lead arsenate also fading out of the picture, infantile paralysis began to disappear.
Even Steedman’s Teething Powder, the mercury containing product administered to teething infants for so long, changed its formula. https://t.co/diycA8lq6f
By 1960, the ineffectiveness of the Salk vaccine concerned scientists and they gathered in Chicago to discuss the problem. People were getting paralyzed after even 4 or more shots. https://t.co/dK31UNcQse
They were also concerned about study in Detroit where they had taken stool samples of nearly 1,000 people diagnosed with polio. Just one third of those people tested actually had polio. Everyone else had been stricken with some other paralyzing virus. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/327642
This presents a problem because many people were told they had “polio” when they were affected as children. The reality is—doctors could not have known what caused the paralysis. It could have been one of many different viruses, pesticides, or even bacteria.
The Sabin oral polio vaccine soon came into use & it could actually control the poliovirus infection within the gut—where it actually made a difference. But it didn’t matter. It only affected the poliovirus—none of the other paralyzing microbes.
By this time (1963), poliomyelitis (aka “polio”) had all but disappeared. As it turns out, neither of the vaccines were actually necessary. The Salk vaccine was horrible at actually preventing paralysis, and the Sabin vaccine came too late to make a difference.
Today, countries that use toxic pesticides still struggle with infantile paralysis, aka polio. Extremely aggressive oral polio vaccine use may help control poliovirus infections…
…but with several other paralyzing viruses in existence, it is not the panacea people believe it to be. To complicate matters, the oral poliovirus vaccine itself occasionally creates paralysis. https://t.co/Qs306taI1x
So what is one to takeaway from all of this? “Polio” is a man-made problem. The paralysis caused from direct pesticide exposure OR from viruses being allowed into the spinal cord can be directly attributed to a man-made cause.
It appeared in epidemic form in the 1890s from the introduction of lead arsenate and disappeared in the 1950s when DDT usage fell. Because we know it was caused by many different things, the effect of a single-virus vaccine on its decline is minimal.
As I mentioned earlier, I have a book that covers this entire story in detail and mentions many things I’ve skipped. It’s called “The Moth in the Iron Lung.” I hope you’re able to read it.
If we can get the polio story correct in our heads, many other problems can be solved. The infantile paralysis that still takes place in many developing countries will not be solved from the polio vaccine! Cleaning up their environment is absolutely necessary.
Many thanks for reading, and I’m happy to try and answer any of your questions.
One more thing, this picture is what everyone thinks of when they think of polio. This was a publicity stunt arranged for Life Magazine. Most of these iron lungs were brand new and were headed around the country to other hospitals.
It was taken in the auditorium of Ranchos Los Amigos Hospital in Los Angeles, which had been emptied of its rows of seating to make this picture. It was designed to show worried parents that the U.S. was ready for battle.
Although the hospital had the largest polio ward in the country, at its peak it would have never had this many iron lungs in operation. Most hospitals in big cities had a couple of iron lungs.
There were around 1,100 in the whole country at their peak. Nothing like this picture would indicate.
The next time you look at this photo, you should be struck at the destructive power of man and his inventions. The poliovirus, like all the other paralytic causes of that era, were incapable of harming us without some of our help.
Program the MatrixPublished August 22, 2022 by tindertender
There are a few accounts I’ve been noticing who have been writing posts in the format of computer code.
I’m curious if this post or message actually inserts itself into the matrix via the code typed within the system.
I’d be interested in the findings of computer code writers as they experiment with “rewriting the code” from inside the very system meant to enslave.
Code example by: https://twitter.com/texn9ne?s=21&t=-ldPj_QptxQlGmwBErzCuA. Visit site for questions regarding code examples.
Unintentional? Or A Strategy?Published July 12, 2022 by tindertender
Distortion of Core Manifestation Body via Black GooPublished June 12, 2022 by tindertender
Hemp, Designed to BuildPublished May 8, 2022 by tindertender
Where are our Hemp Fields?
Bring them back now.