Science

All posts in the Science category

They Were Our Healers

Published November 23, 2025 by tindertender

Epstein has been mentioned quite a bit lately. The Most High God, Divine Masculine, Upper Echelon, Supreme Justice … they’re quite pissed about them doing “scientists experiments” on the Divine Feminine being funneled through these spaces. They were our healers. Caught in a trap … used as birthing people for “intelligent animals”.

They own the image … the whole script.

Published November 10, 2025 by tindertender

Rise of the Clones

Published October 12, 2025 by tindertender

By: Nicholas Schizzano

Those who have read Rise of the Clones: The Cabbage Patch Babies, will already recognise the name “Kid Buu.” Others who have explored the subject of human cloning, may also have come across him, but for those who haven’t please allow me to introduce him:

Kid Buu, born Markquez Lao Santiago in Jersey City, New Jersey, has gone further than almost anyone else in the public eye, when it comes to cloning and states publicly that he is a “second-generation” clone. According to his own account, the original version of himself was born in New Jersey and the man the world now sees, was created later in a laboratory in Canada. He says his memories were wiped, his emotions reset and a new consciousness installed.

His story first reached a wider audience in October 2018, during an Instagram Live broadcast. On camera he appeared beside a man who looked exactly like him – the same tattoos, the same face, the same hair and calmly introduced him as his clone. He told viewers the process had cost millions of dollars and had been carried out in secret in Canada. The footage spread rapidly and cemented his reputation as “the clone rapper.”

Soon afterwards, in a widely viewed interview with DJ Vlad on VladTV, recorded in late 2018 and titled “Kid Buu on Being a Clone, Age and Abuse Allegations,” he expanded on his claims. He described himself as a “second-generation” version created in Canada and spoke about DNA sequencing, hypnosis and memory suppression. He said painful memories were erased using hypnotic techniques and symbols in his tattoos reflected his origins. He also described witnessing a UFO with his mother’s boyfriend, an encounter he credits with drawing him towards the Raëlian movement, a group that teaches life on Earth was created by advanced beings. This belief system is directly connected to the cloning technology used on him and prompted me to research them for myself and share my findings with my readers.

When explaining where this cloning occurred, Kid Buu named Clonaid as the organisation responsible and this is where my work intersects directly with his. I actually wrote an entire chapter about Clonaid, from its origins to the extraordinary claims of cloning humans and the secrecy surrounding it. Therefore, hearing Kid Buu name that very organisation, echoed with what I have been investigating for years.

Kid Buu continues to claim that cloning is not a futuristic idea, but an existing practice shaping culture and celebrity. He presents himself as living proof of what is happening behind closed doors. Whether his story is confession, performance or warning, it remains one of the most detailed public accounts of its kind and challenges the assumption that cloning belongs only to science fiction.

Guy Anderson – Author
Tesla & The Cabbage Patch Kids
Rise of the Clones: The Cabbage Patch Babies

Genetic Engineering ~ Toying with Neurons

Published September 4, 2025 by tindertender

They mess with the brain while people sleep, they like toying with neurons.

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1EN9uEozm9/?mibextid=wwXIfr

Metagenomics is the study of the collective genetic material from a diverse, uncultured microbial community directly from its natural environment, allowing for the analysis of microbial diversity and function that was previously impossible with traditional lab cultivation methods. It uses DNA sequencing to uncover the species present (composition) and their functional capabilities (metabolic potential), providing a comprehensive view of complex ecosystems like the human gut or ocean water. 
 

Key Concepts

  • Uncultured Microorganisms:The primary goal of metagenomics is to study microorganisms that cannot be grown in a laboratory setting, which constitute the vast majority of microbes on Earth. 
  • Community-Level Study:Instead of focusing on individual microbes, metagenomics examines the entire genetic makeup of a microbial community, or metagenome. 
  • Functional Potential:By analyzing the genes within a metagenome, researchers can infer the collective metabolic capabilities and functions of the entire microbial community. 

Methods

  • Shotgun Metagenomics:Involves randomly fragmenting all DNA in a sample and sequencing the fragments to get a comprehensive overview of all genetic material in the community. 
  • Metabarcoding:A targeted approach that involves amplifying and sequencing specific marker genes, such as the 16S rRNA gene for bacteria, to characterize the community’s composition. 

Applications

  • Microbial Ecology:Understanding the structure and function of microbial communities in various environments, such as soil, water, and the human body. 
  • Human Health:Studying the human microbiome (microorganisms in and on the body) to understand its role in health and disease. 
  • Biotechnology:Discovering new enzymes and metabolic pathways from uncultivable microbes for industrial applications. 
  • Environmental Science:Monitoring and managing microbial communities in response to environmental changes. 

SO THEY SAY:

The term 

nanolabotomy is not a real medical procedure. It is a fabricated term associated with online conspiracy theories about a proposed program by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). 

The misinformation originates from a misinterpretation of a DARPA program and combines two different ideas:

  • DARPA’s Next-Generation Nonsurgical Neurotechnology (N3) program: This legitimate program, announced in 2018, aims to develop a high-resolution, bidirectional brain-machine interface that does not require surgery. The goal is to create a headset or other portable device that could allow soldiers to interface with machines.
  • Lobotomy: An outdated and discredited psychosurgical procedure that involved severing nerve pathways in the brain’s frontal lobe. It is not performed today due to severe side effects and the development of modern psychiatric medication. 

Conspiracy theorists have falsely combined these two concepts, claiming that DARPA is secretly funding “nanolabotomies” to manipulate and control the brains of citizens through genetic engineering and nano-sensors. 

In summary, the term “nanolabotomy” is used to describe a fictional procedure that has no basis in scientific or medical fact.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6759331/

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10397308/

An “engineered eugenetic system” would involve using advanced biotechnology, particularly genetic engineering, to guide human evolution toward desired traits.

The historical atrocities committed under the name of eugenics, combined with modern scientific capabilities like CRISPR, mean that this concept is now at the center of intense scientific and ethical debate. 

Historical context: Coercive eugenics

The concept of eugenics first gained traction in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, but these movements were based on flawed science and social prejudice. 

  • A discredited “science”: Proponents, such as Francis Galton and Charles Davenport, claimed that complex human behaviors like poverty and criminality were based on simple Mendelian inheritance. They ignored environmental factors and used this pseudoscience to justify systemic discrimination.
  • Systemic abuse: This ideology fueled policies in many countries, including the U.S. and Nazi Germany, that led to horrific human rights abuses, including involuntary sterilization, racial segregation, and genocide.
  • Key historical distinction: This “old eugenics” was defined by its coercive nature, its flawed scientific basis, and its goal of population-wide “improvement” by forcing specific groups to be sterilized or killed. 

Modern context: Genetic engineering and the “new eugenics”

With the advent of powerful and precise gene-editing tools like CRISPR, the discussion around eugenics has reemerged. Modern genetic technologies offer two main pathways for genetic alteration: 

  • Somatic gene editing: This modifies genes in an individual’s body cells (e.g., to cure a genetic disease like sickle-cell anemia), but these changes are not passed on to offspring.
  • Heritable (germline) gene editing: This modifies genes in eggs, sperm, or embryos, meaning the changes are passed down to all future generations. 

It is the potential to use heritable gene editing for enhancement, rather than just therapy, that is often referred to as the “new eugenics”. 

Ethical concerns of an engineered eugenetic system

Experts and international bodies, including the World Health Organization, have raised serious concerns about the development of an engineered eugenetic system. 

  • Medical versus enhancement: The distinction between correcting a genetic defect (therapy) and improving a normal human trait (enhancement) is not always clear and is central to the ethical debate.
  • Equality and access: The high cost of genetic technologies could create a society with a genetically privileged upper class and an unenhanced lower class, exacerbating existing socioeconomic inequality.
  • Arbitrary perfection: The creation of arbitrary standards for what is considered a “desirable” trait could lead to a less diverse and resilient human population and increase social stigma against those who are different.
  • Long-term consequences: The effects of heritable genetic modifications could have unforeseen and irreversible consequences for future generations.
  • Loss of diversity: A reduction in human genetic diversity could have unforeseen negative impacts on the long-term health and adaptability of the human species.
  • The slippery slope: There is a concern that using germline editing, even for therapeutic purposes, could put humanity on a “slippery slope” toward non-therapeutic applications and a new, market-based form of eugenics. 

https://www.genome.gov/about-genomics/fact-sheets/Eugenics-and-Scientific-Racism

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9635610/

Nanoparticulates in the Brain?

Published February 13, 2025 by tindertender

What if Alzheimer’s isn’t aluminum at all, but an over abundance of nanoparticulates in the brain?

Many of these nanoparticulates are programmable. Could this be why more and more people are hearing things and experiencing mental instability

https://spectrum.ieee.org/nanoparticles-found-in-brains-comes-from-external-sources

Bio-Warfare

Published October 14, 2023 by tindertender

Scientists … sometimes working for the benefit of life and others to its detriment.

HIV/Aids was a manufactured virus, HPV also, both of which were released, knowingly, onto the citizenry.

It need not be said, but I’ll say it anyway … the ramifications of contracting either is soul crushing in more ways than one.

Shame, guilt, the denial that arises in mind of ever loving again, of being intimate occurs. Anger develops, not at the ones who unleashed these things into the public, but to the partner who carries it, and to self for allowing self be vulnerable to such things.

Consciousness, a good conscious, will go celibate, denying self of the privilege of intimacy, feeling dirtied and not wanting to dirty another. Or, they will put it out there in the hopes of connecting with another who has suffered the same contraction.

These viruses are bio-weapons used upon the populace.

Governments and scientists and researchers will deny it, yet it is the case, nonetheless.

Meant to harm the psyche, the individuals sense of self-worth, of value. Toying with a persons emotional and mental package is the name of the game. It always has been.

Covid-19 is also a bio-weapon.

My hope is that people will stop slandering each other for things out of their control. Accepting and loving each other has nothing to do with sex, yet many make it the primary focus of the beginning stages of love. Once procreation is no longer viable, then really, what’s the use of it anyway beyond self-gratification?

There was once a time sexual interactions were utilized to generate an abundant creative power. Indeed, many still use it in this fashion. The average person tho only seeks gratification.

Being a creator, ALL being Creator, the sense of insufficiency must be put aside.

The whole of the world is toxified in one form or another, purposefully.

All we can do now is see it for what it is … a manipulation of the human body, genome … which will really ramp up when the forced vaccinations begin. The forced vaccinations which will not keep anyone healthy, but keep them in decline instead.

When the world looks at a person as tho they are dirty, it is an infection that gets on the people they view that way, in their mind and heart. When a person is looked at and viewed in this manner by enough people, they start to feel themselves in a degraded sense of being, viewing their own self as “less than” … simply because they begin to carry that energy which has been placed upon them.

This is not what a loving society does to each other.

Just like drinking a glass of wine will cause one person to get DUII and many others not, it is roulette. Someday, it, or death, will come to all who drink.

The marriage of individuals rarely lasts any more. There will be multiple partners. Being together is risky business, because not all will be upfront, honest and truthful about their past, they’ll be so focused on gratification, or the seeking of new ‘love’.

Sometimes it is best to simply learn to love ones self.

A reality forced upon an honorable person via science, and covert war tactics.

Is this knowledge of a requirement to generate love of self a good thing, or negative?

Perhaps it is both.

Rockets Bursting In Air

Published April 20, 2023 by tindertender

I don’t understand the fascination with rockets when there is antigravity ufo type ships, or arcs, in use that travel at warp speeds. Unless he’s trying to blow the firmament so they can all get out, and others get in? Could be why the rapid unscheduled disassembly occurred.

Scientists Splicing Human Genes into the Food Supply Since 20,000 BC?

Published March 5, 2023 by tindertender

Of course they won’t admit it, and they’ve locked away the data in vaults the chattel shall never see.

Some say that during 18,000 BC is when the developed the sow that we eat, by genetically splicing it with humans, and that eating them, is essentially eating self. Canablism. I’ve heard stories of the genetically modifying rice with human dna too. Let me find it.

Its U.S. developers say they could be used to treat children with diarrhoea, a major killer in the Third World. 

The rice is a major step in so-called Frankenstein Foods, the first mingling of human-origin genes and those from plants. But the U.S. Department of Agriculture has already signalled it plans to allow commercial cultivation. 

The rice’s producers, California-based Ventria Bioscience, have been given preliminary approval to grow it on more than 3,000 acres in Kansas. The company plans to harvest the proteins and use them in drinks, desserts, yoghurts and muesli bars. 

The news provoked horror among GM critics and consumer groups on both sides of the Atlantic. 

GeneWatch UK, which monitors new GM foods, described it as “very disturbing”. Researcher Becky Price warned: “There are huge, huge health risks and people should rightly be concerned about this.” 

Friends of the Earth campaigner Clare Oxborrow said: “Using food crops and fields as glorified drug factories is a very worrying development. 

“If these pharmaceutical crops end up on consumers’ plates, the consequences for our health could be devastating. 

“The biotech industry has already failed to prevent experimental GM rice contaminating the food chain. 

“The Government must urge the U.S. to ban the production of drugs in food crops. It must also introduce tough measures to prevent illegal GM crops contaminating our food and ensure that biotech companies are liable for any damage their products cause.” 

In the U.S., the Union of Concerned Scientists, a policy advocacy group, warned: “It is unwise to produce drugs in plants outdoors. 

“There would be little control over the doses people might get exposed to, and some might be allergic to the proteins.” 

The American Consumers Union and the Washingtonbased Centre for Food Safety also oppose Ventria’s plans. 

As well as the contamination fears there are serious ethical concerns about such a fundamental interference with the building blocks of life. 

Yet there is no legal means for Britain and Europe to ban such products on ethical grounds. 

Imports would have to be accepted once they had gone through a scientific safety assessment. 

The development is what may people feared when, ten years ago, food scientists showed what was possible by inserting copies of fish genes from the flounder into tomatoes, to help them withstand frost.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-440302/The-rice-human-genes.html

https://phys.org/news/2011-06-genetic-rice-years.html
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/researchers-transfer-human-protein-plants-supersize-them-180978443/

They say they’re using “other animals” but they’re using the human genome. Soul traps?

https://www.google.com/search?q=science+sicing+human+genes+into+the+food+supply&rlz=1CDGOYI_enUS704US704&oq=science+sicing+human+genes+into+the+food+supply&aqs=chrome..69i57.17123j0j4&hl=en-US&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8

They’re doing terrible things in Ukraines biolabs. Not only creating weapons of virological assault on life, but most likely contaminating “everything” from food, to medicines.

https://www.foxnews.com/transcript/tucker-the-pentagon-is-lying-about-bio-labs-in-ukraine

Estrogen in the Food Supply

Published March 1, 2023 by tindertender

Estrogen in plastics … have a listen. The food supply is messing humans up fierce!!

This woman is incredibly knowledgeable.

Did you know red clover is plant estrogen?

What the PCR Tests Are Really For

Published November 26, 2022 by tindertender

The cloning of expressed genes and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), two biotechnological breakthroughs of the 1970s and 1980s, continue to play significant roles in science today. Both technologies give researchers the means to make more DNA, but they do so in different ways. In particular, cloning involves the synthesis of DNA from mRNA using an enzyme called reverse transcriptase. Although this method reverses the flow of genetic information as described by the central dogma, it effectively mimics the process by which RNA viruses “flip” the direction of transcription in their host cells, thereby causing these cells to manufacture viral DNA even though the viruses themselves contain only RNA. In contrast, the polymerase chain reaction does not involve the use of an initial mRNA template to manufacture DNA. Rather, PCR involves the synthesis of multiple copies of specific DNA fragments using an enzyme known as DNA polymerase. This method allows for the creation of literally billions of DNA molecules within a matter of hours, making it much more efficient than the cloning of expressed genes. However, cloning remains the go-to method for researchers when only the mRNA template (and not the DNA template) of a sequence of interest is available.

Read more here:

https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/the-biotechnology-revolution-pcr-and-the-use-553/