If a professional boxer, or wrestler, gets into a tussle with an everyday, non-pro citizen, they will be charged with assault using a deadly weapon. Their bodies are considered deadly weapons, given their skill set.
Men who choose to use their penis to assault a woman, or child, are using their body as an assault weapon, and often they are not charged, often the woman/child is shamed and drilled with torturous language that assumes their guilt.
Why is it that when a man assaults with fists a man weaker or less skilled than themselves there are consequences. Yet when a man assaults anything other than a man, (a child, woman, animal) he usually gets away with it without consequences?
It is apparent to anyone without a penis that this imbalance is a rigged scenario, kept in place by those in the political system only so they can (also) continue in their horrendous ways without persecution.
Fists are considered a deadly weapon when used upon other men if you are a professional fighter.
Any other body part (ie: penis) used in forcing another person to withstand attack and assault is not considered Use of a weapon.
Some political people who make these exceptions (men) are gearing the laws to suit them (men) leaving all others to be considered ‘less’.
Screwy mindset these power hungry glory seekers have.
In the United States if you use a gun to hurt someone you are labeled a felon and can no longer possess a weapon. If a man uses his penis in a rape, he should be eliminated of that weapon, as he would be any other weapon used for harm. The citizenry would benefit from a clear marking on that individual (tattoo) plainly seen so folks know yo steer clear of this abuser.
There are many ways to inflict harm on people, so people should be given fair and obvious warning when these individuals attempt to enter into friend and family circles.
I’m sick of perverts getting protected by the law when innocence is destroyed daily.