Today I had opportunity to sit with beautiful people during a wonderful talk and meditation. There came a time at the end of the evening where people shared a transfer of healing and loving energies, I participated.
I suppose there is an uncertainty in all ‘first appearances’ where one may not know all the ins and outs of a particular group, leading to a second guessing of ones self.
You see, this sharing of energetic transfer I speak of went by a certain name in this group. I do not like the separation names give particular ideals … many of the teachings and beliefs are cross connected, often the same, given differing titles.
While what I would call this exchange may differ from what it was called tonight, I found the process being questioned. This questioning, although unintentional, sparked a slight division and caused me to consider the evening in a bit of a different light.
Many sects do this with each other.
Christianity has so many different branches, as do many other religions. I have always thought the whole of creation sits under one umbrella, not quite understanding the need to separate and bicker about who is ‘right’ and who is ‘wrong’, who is permitted to engage and who must sit by the sidelines …
While many people talk of ‘being one’ under one consciousness, intertwined and of the same source, this separation vocabulary still exists. In reality, as I see it, unless people begin to see in truth, the connection between beliefs, nothing will change.
It’s all energy. This shouldn’t be such an issue, but it is. Languages and practices use different names and ideas … yet essentially they are all the same. So how can the world make the connection between them, really, and shed this separation?
All forms of energetic sharing are of sameness. Positive = positive and negative = negative. Anything which causes one to feel they ought to apologize for a loving share isn’t so positive.